Author： COCKELL C.
Publisher： Springer Publishing Company
ISSN： 0167-9295
Source： Earth, Moon, and Planets, Vol.94, Iss.3-4, 2004-06, pp. : 233-243
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Regardless of the discovery of life on Mars, or of “no apparent life” on Mars, the questions that follow will provide a rich future for biological exploration. Extraordinary pattern recognition skills, decadal assimilation of data and experience, and rapid sample acquisition are just three of the characteristics that make humans the best means we have to explore the biological potential of Mars and other planetary surfaces. I make the case that instead of seeing robots as in conflict, or even in support, of human exploration activity, from the point of view of scientific data gathering and analysis, we should view humans as the most powerful robots we have, thus removing the separation that dogs discussions on the exploration of space. The narrow environmental requirements of humans, although imposing constraints on the life support systems required, is more than compensated for by their capabilities in biological exploration. I support this view with an example of the “Christmas present effect,” a simple demonstration of human data and pattern recognition capabilities.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
Space Exploration of Planetary Magnetism
By Ness Norman
Space Science Reviews, Vol. 152, Iss. 1-4, 2010-05 ,pp. :
Religion, Space Exploration, and Secular Society
By Mersch Carol
Astropolitics, Vol. 11, Iss. 1-2, 2013-01 ,pp. :
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR HUMAN SPACE EXPLORATION
Earth, Moon, and Planets, Vol. 94, Iss. 3-4, 2004-06 ,pp. :
Space Exploration and Folk Beliefs on Climate Change
By Pop Virgiliu
Astropolitics, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. :