

Author: Allen Colin Bekoff Marc
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 1382-4554
Source: The Journal of Ethics, Vol.11, Iss.3, 2007-09, pp. : 299-317
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Our goal in this paper is to provide enough of an account of the origins of cognitive ethology and the controversy surrounding it to help ethicists to gauge for themselves how to balance skepticism and credulity about animal minds when communicating with scientists. We believe that ethicists’ arguments would benefit from better understanding of the historical roots of ongoing controversies. It is not appropriate to treat some widely reported results in animal cognition as if their interpretations are a matter of scientific consensus. It is especially important to understand why loose references to “cognitive ethology” by philosophers can signal ignorance of the field to scientists who are more deeply immersed in the relevant literature. Understanding the variety of approaches to cognitive phenomena in animals is essential if such capacities are to form the foundation of scientifically-informed ethical reasoning about animals.
Related content


WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS: COGNITIVE SCIENCE (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 4, Iss. 5, 2013-09 ,pp. :


A Wittgensteinian Conception of Animal Minds
Grazer Philosophische Studien, Vol. 88, Iss. 1, 2013-12 ,pp. :


Smith and Hume on Animal Minds
Journal of Scottish Philosophy, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2018-09 ,pp. :


The European Legacy, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, 2007-07 ,pp. :


Animal Mind and Animal Ethics: An Introduction
The Journal of Ethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, 2007-09 ,pp. :