Obesity: an indication rather than contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Author： Unger Stephen Wise Unger Harold Milton Edelman David S. Scott James Steven Rosenbaum Gary

ISSN： 1708-0428

Source： Obesity Surgery, Vol.2, Iss.1, 1992-02, pp. : 29-31

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Obesity was originally designated as a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy; however, as experience in the procedure develops, it is evolving into an indication. Out of the first 325 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 91 were determined to be either obese or morbidly obese. Group I (normal body habitus), consisted of 228 patients, group II (obese) 67 patients, and group III (morbidly obese) 24 patients. Six patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up data. The groups were fairly well matched for age and seemed to differ only in height and weight. Operative time was similar in groups I and II, while it was approximately 23% longer for group III. The outcome of surgery was compared with respect to conversion to open cholecystectomy, postoperative complications, mortality, length of postoperative stay, and return to normal activity. None of the differences were statistically significant with the exception of the slightly longer length of time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the morbidly obese. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective treatment for obese patients and even for morbidly obese patients, and should be the procedure of choice for these patients, avoiding complications of prolonged bedrest and wound complications, so common in these patients.