Dangerous Liaisons: Art, Fashion and Individualism

Author: Radford Robert  

Publisher: Bloomsbury Journals (formerly Berg Journals)

ISSN: 1751-7419

Source: Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture, Vol.2, Iss.2, 1998-05, pp. : 151-163

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Throughout commentaries, there has been an almost unquestioned belief that an essential feature of the nature of art is that it should demonstrate endurance and truth. Fashion has been represented as art’s “other”. Until relatively recently it has acquired no laudatory history, no museum of example, no philosophy or critique. It seemed that fashion totally conflicts with concepts of permanence, truth and authenticity. However, this system of values has recently shifted, now that postmodernity and the demonstrations of the New Art History have exposed the insecurity of art’s ideas and have established a widespread cultural permission to recognize the new authenticity of fashion, in the sense that it reflects and communicates the values and anthropological truths of contemporary experience. Increasingly critics and curators are convincing us of the growing proximity between the practices of Art and Fashion. Radford argues that art has been progressively taking on certain qualities mainly associated with fashion, namely seduction, ephemerality, and discrimination within a genre; but doubts that an equivalent transition has emerged out of fashion’s relations with art. He compares art and fashion in terms of visual culture, material culture, economic function, and sociological function. The article concludes that fashion conquers and infiltrates all areas of social, cultural and academic enterprise. Inevitably art is subsumed within these processes; but to maintain its distance and purpose it retains resistance via irony and skepticism.