Author: Tregear Angela Kuznesof Sharron Brennan Mary
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 0267-257X
Source: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol.23, Iss.5-6, 2007-06, pp. : 411-424
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
For some years now, marketing educators have been exhorted to adopt more critical approaches in teaching and learning. Such approaches are purported to bring numerous benefits to students, including improved appraisal skills, self-awareness, and enhanced abilities to deal with the uncertainties and ambiguities of marketing practice. To date however, there has been very little empirical study of how students respond to critical approaches, and whether they perceive any of the proposed benefits themselves. This study addresses the gap by investigating the perceptions and experiences of students on two modules, both of which take similarly designed critical approaches. In practice, students were found to perceive the modules as more labour intensive and intellectually challenging than others, due primarily to the volume and depth of required reading. The task of being critical was itself perceived as difficult, due to the need for a different mindset, and for students to have confidence in their own ideas. However, overall evaluations of the modules were positive, and students identified a number of benefits and personal rewards from their experiences, at least some of which matched with those proposed in the literature. The paper discusses factors influencing students' perceptions and concludes with some practical recommendations.
Related content
By Alleyne Philmore Persaud Nadini
Journal of International Education in Business, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2012-05 ,pp. :
European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, 1993-12 ,pp. :