DEBATE - Theory and History in Thinking the Transition to Capitalism: A Reply to Zmolek

ISSN： 0306-6150

Source： The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol.29, Iss.2, 2002-01, pp. : 125-134

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

DEBATE - Further Thoughts on Agrarian Capitalism: A Reply to Albritton

By Zmolek M.

The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 2001-10 ,pp. : 129-154

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Clarifying the Root Differences: Considerations on the Debate with Zmolek

By Albritton Robert

The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, 2004-01 ,pp. : 306-312

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Law and neoclassical economics theory: a critical history of the distribution/efficiency debate

By Hackney J.R.

The Journal of Socioeconomics, Vol. 32, Iss. 4, 2003-09 ,pp. : 361-390

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The theory of capital as a theory of capitalism

Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2017-06 ,pp. : 305-325

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to the comments on ‘Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History’

Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 2011-12 ,pp. : 595-613

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite