Sentencing guidelines: A quantitative comparison of sentencing policies in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington *

Author： Kramer John   Lubitz Robin   Kempinen Cynthia  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 0741-8825

Source： Justice Quarterly, Vol.6, Iss.4, 1989-12, pp. : 565-587

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines

By Kramer John   Ulmer Jeffery  

Justice Quarterly, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, 1996-03 ,pp. : 81-106

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sentencing guidelines and recidivism rates of juvenile offenders

By Schneider Anne  

Justice Quarterly, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, 1984-03 ,pp. : 107-124

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Equality by Numbers or Words: A Comparative Study of Sentencing Structures in Minnesota and in Denmark

By Wandall* Rasmus  

Criminal Law Forum, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 2006-03 ,pp. : 1-41

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Policies and Imprisonment: The Impact of Structured Sentencing and Determinate Sentencing on State Incarceration Rates, 1978-2004

By Stemen Don   Rengifo Andres  

Justice Quarterly, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, 2011-02 ,pp. : 174-201

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

United Kingdom ∙ New Sentencing Guidelines Start to Bite for Food Hygiene Cases

By Ross Hilary  

European Food and Feed Law Review (EFFL), Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2017-02 ,pp. : 61-62

Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH

Access to resources Recommend Favorite