Author： Pettman Ralph
Publisher： Routledge Ltd
ISSN： 0955-7571
Source： Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol.18, Iss.1, 2005-04, pp. : 137-150
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The article argues that global security should be seen as synonymous with human security, and that strategic studies should be located within that broader rubric. Mounting such an argument means meeting the charge of those who see the broader construction of strategic studies as vague and meaningless, and as detracting from the ability to make good policy. The article attempts, therefore, to map human security in as inclusive and systematic a way as possible. It attempts to show that the concept is neither vague nor meaningless, and is suitable, therefore, to be the basis for a comprehensive account of global security.
Related content
Critical human security studies
Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, Iss. 1, 2010-01 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Taoism and the concept of global security
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2005-04 ,pp. :
Strategic Culture and Indonesian Maritime Security
Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2018-01 ,pp. :
By Button Mark
Global Crime, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 2010-02 ,pp. :