Resolute Ambivalence: Why Judiciaries Do Not Institutionalize Their Decision Support Systems

ISSN： 1364-6885

Source： International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol.14, Iss.3, 2000-11, pp. : 297-316

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Introduction: Why Study Judicial Decision Support Systems?

By Tata Cyrus

International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2000-11 ,pp. : 279-282

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On the Philosophical and Theoretical Implications of Judicial Decision Support Systems

By Henham Ralph J

International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2000-11 ,pp. : 283-296

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Building Decision Support Systems in Discretionary Legal Domains

By Zeleznikow John

International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2000-11 ,pp. : 341-356

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why Do the Finns Trust the Police?

By Kaariainen Juha

Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2008-01 ,pp. : 141-159

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Desocialization of the Courts, Sentencing Decision Support and Plea Bargaining

By Vincent Andrew Zeleznikow John

International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 21, Iss. 2, 2007-07 ,pp. : 157-175

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite