Author: Gale Tim Irvine Karen Laws Keith Ferrissey Sue
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1380-3395
Source: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Developm, Vol.31, Iss.5, 2008-10, pp. : 565-574
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Controversy exists as to whether semantic disruption in Alzheimer's disease (AD) systematically impairs the naming of living things. Moreover, little is known about performance across more specific subcategories. We investigated picture naming in 28 AD patients and 24 controls. To deal with nonnormal distributions, we created 1,000 bootstrap hierarchical regressions and determined which variables (the “nuisance” variables familiarity, word frequency, age of acquisition and visual complexity; category; and control naming) best predicted AD patient naming. Nuisance variables combined, control naming, and category uniquely accounted for 39%, 36%, and 3% of patient naming variance, respectively. Finally, analysis of the AD naming profile across the 10 subcategories mirrored that of controls. Taken together, these findings indicate that while AD naming is, of course, quantitatively worse than that of controls, it does not qualitatively differ—that is, it is an exaggerated normal profile.
Related content
Olfaction in elderly and patients with Alzheimer's disease:
By Hughes L..F.
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Vol. 3, Iss. 4, 2001-01 ,pp. :
By Gilbert Paul E. Murphy Claire
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Developm, Vol. 26, Iss. 6, 2004-09 ,pp. :
By Grothe Michel Zaborszky Laszlo Atienza Mercedes Gil-Neciga Eulogio Rodriguez-Romero Rafael Teipel Stefan J. Amunts Katrin Suarez-Gonzalez Aida Cantero Jose L.
Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 20, Iss. 7, 2010-07 ,pp. :