Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied

Author： Hanczakowski Maciej Mazzoni Giuliana

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1464-0686

Source： Memory, Vol.19, Iss.3, 2011-04, pp. : 280-289

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes

By Naveh-Benjamin Moshe Craik Fergus I. M. Perretta James G. Tonev Simon T.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 2000-08 ,pp. : 609-625

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Encoding and output order processes in short-term order recall of distinctive items

By Healy Alice F. Cunningham Thomas F. Parker James T.

Memory, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 2002-01 ,pp. : 29-43

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Effect of distinctive encoding on false recognition, discrimination, and decision criteria in young and elderly adults

By Taconnat Laurence Clarys David Vanneste Sandrine Isingrini Michel

The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 18, Iss. 5, 2006-09 ,pp. : 708-729

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Providing information about diagnostic features at retrieval reduces false recognition

By Lane Sean Roussel Cristine Starns Jeffrey Villa Diane Alonzo Jill

Memory, Vol. 16, Iss. 8, 2008-09 ,pp. : 836-851

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: A multinomial processing tree analysis

By Küpper-Tetzel Carolina E. Erdfelder Edgar

Memory, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 37-47

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite