Author: Harrison Teresa D.
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1466-4283
Source: Applied Economics, Vol.38, Iss.6, 2006-04, pp. : 637-647
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Merger pairings are categorized based on the ownership status, teaching status, hospital size, caseload severity, and geographical distance of merging hospitals to determine the types of hospitals that tend to merge with each other. The results show that mergers between two non-teaching, nonprofit or for-profit hospitals occur more often, but that only ownership status, not teaching status, affects the propensity to merge after controlling for other merger pair characteristics. This paper also finds that hospitals are more likely to merge with a partner of similar size and close geographical proximity, but not necessarily the closest candidate. However, ownership status, not distance between hospitals, is the dominant determinant of merger pairs.
Related content
The large and the small - who exploits whom?
By Xu X.
Economics Letters, Vol. 63, Iss. 3, 1999-06 ,pp. :
Quality competition and hospital mergers—An experiment
HEALTH ECONOMICS, Vol. 26, Iss. S3, 2017-12 ,pp. :