

Author: Schmidt Vivien
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1466-4429
Source: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.14, Iss.7, 2007-10, pp. : 992-1009
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Until relatively recently, French élites seemed to have found a winning combination for the communicative discourses through which they legitimated European integration and responded to globalization. First, the Gaullist discourse underplayed the loss of sovereignty by emphasizing the gains to interests and identity through French leadership in Europe. Next, the Mitterrandist discourse updated the ideas in the Gaullist paradigm to legitimate further institutional integration while it added a new rationale for greater economic integration: Europeanization as a shield against globalization. The discourse in the Chirac years did little to change or update this discourse. The problem today is that neither the institutional nor the economic ideas in the discourse are persuasive: the public is convinced that France no longer leads Europe and that Europe no longer protects against globalization. And yet, French élites seem trapped in the old discourse, unable to develop new ideas capable of legitimating France in Europe and the world. This was dramatized by the 2005 French 'no' vote on the Constitutional Treaty, and did not change with the 2007 French presidential elections.
Related content




FRENCH POLITICAL SCIENCE AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
By Smith Andy
Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 2000-12 ,pp. :



