Anti-discrimination policy actors and their use of litigation strategies: the influence of identity politics

ISSN： 1466-4429

Source： Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.16, Iss.5, 2009-08, pp. : 738-754

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Paralleling the institutionalization of human rights in European Community (EC) law is a growing body of literature on the use of strategic litigation by policy actors to expand or enforce those rights. Until recently however, relatively little scholarly attention has been paid to the full range of factors which influence the use of strategic litigation by organizational actors. This paper assesses existing explanations of strategy choice and finds that the emphasis on political and legal opportunity approaches and resource-mobilization explanations has led to a neglect of other, potentially important, variables. I aim to remedy this gap in the literature by suggesting that the identity politics and framing processes of a social movement may play a significant role in influencing the take-up of a litigation strategy. Case studies of the disability movement and the lesbian and gay movement in the United Kingdom illustrate how these variables can shape strategy choice.