Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: Alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology

ISSN： 1469-8331

Source： Health, Risk & Society, Vol.9, Iss.2, 2007-06, pp. : 211-227

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The GM debate: Risk, politics and public engagement

By Heyman Bob

Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 13, Iss. 6, 2011-09 ,pp. : 596-598

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: Implications for public health, risk assessment and the public perception of nanotechnology

By Handy R. D. Shaw B. J.

Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2007-06 ,pp. : 125-144

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Communicating risk to patients and the public

By Polak Louisa

British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 62, Iss. 598, 2012-05 ,pp. : 240-240

Royal College of General Practitioners

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Communicating risk to patients and the public

By Naik Gurudutt Ahmed Haroon Edwards Adrian GK

British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 62, Iss. 597, 2012-04 ,pp. : 213-216

Royal College of General Practitioners

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or 'upstream engagement'?

By Pidgeon Nick Rogers-Hayden Tee

Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2007-06 ,pp. : 191-210

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite