Author： Sarkar Husain
Publisher： Routledge Ltd
ISSN： 1469-9281
Source： International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol.14, Iss.2, 2000-07, pp. : 187-197
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Jarrett Leplin in A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism (1997) argues that if the thesis of empirical equivalence is cogent, then the thesis of underdetermination cannot even get off the ground. Part of Leplin's argument rests on the claim that auxiliary hypotheses can be independently confirmed, thus enabling us to determine the epistemic worth of a theory. This, in turn, helps in determining about what we should be realists. Leplin's claims are demonstrated to be problematic. Leplin wants, inconsistently, to use only those auxiliary hypotheses which dovetail with confirmed theories. Finally, a detail of Leplin's argument is found wanting.
Related content
Holism, Underdetermination, And The Dynamics Of Empirical Theories
By Gähde U.
Synthese, Vol. 130, Iss. 1, 2002-01 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
The Underdetermination of Total Theories
Erkenntnis, Vol. 47, Iss. 2, 1997-09 ,pp. :
Underdetermination, methodological practices, and realism
Synthese, Vol. 190, Iss. 17, 2013-11 ,pp. :
Reconsidering Closure, Underdetermination, and Infallibilism
Grazer Philosophische Studien, Vol. 80, Iss. 1, 2010-03 ,pp. :