Ante-nuptial contracts after Radmacher: an impermissible gloss?

ISSN： 1469-9621

Source： Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol.33, Iss.1, 2011-03, pp. : 15-24

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Tort—Husband's Ante-Nuptial Tort—Wife's ‘Thing in Action’—Wife Entitled to Sue Husband for its Protection—Married Women's Property Act, 1882, ss. 12, 24

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, 1949-07 ,pp. : 271-272

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42

By Thompson Sharon

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 33, Iss. 1, 2011-03 ,pp. : 61-70

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Directors' Duties—An Unnecessary Gloss

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 47, Iss. 2, 1988-07 ,pp. : 175-177

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Contracts of employment

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 739, Iss. 1, 2004-06 ,pp. : 9-11

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Leases as Contracts

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 52, Iss. 2, 1993-07 ,pp. : 212-214

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite