

Author: Tessema Mekbeb Lilieholm Robert Ashenafi Zelealem Leader-Williams Nigel
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1521-0723
Source: Society and Natural Resources, Vol.23, Iss.6, 2010-06, pp. : 489-506
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Across Africa, national policies that established protected areas (PAs) typically limited local use of wildlife and other resources. Over time, these policies have raised tensions with rural communities and today threaten to undermine conservation goals. This article examines community-PA relationships at four important sites in Ethiopia—a country of rich tradition with an unusual colonial past. Using focus groups and household surveys, we found that despite local tensions, most respondents held positive views toward wildlife and nearby PAs. Factors influencing positive views included receiving PA benefits, good relations with PA staff, higher education levels, being older, having a large family, diversified income sources, owning fewer livestock, and fewer incidents of wildlife conflicts. In contrast, the devolved control of PAs from federal to regional levels has not influenced community-PA relations as intended. Our results suggest that relations could be improved through involving communities in co-management arrangements, honoring resource tenure and use rights, providing benefits, and implementing conservation education programs.
Related content


Gender and Attitudes toward Protected Areas in Myanmar
Society and Natural Resources, Vol. 26, Iss. 8, 2013-08 ,pp. :


By Chowdhury Mohammad Shaheed Hossain
The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 2013-02 ,pp. :


Normative Standards for Wildlife Viewing in Parks and Protected Areas
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 2010-01 ,pp. :

