Author： Williams David M. Kociolek J. Patrick
Publisher： Taylor & Francis Ltd
ISSN： 0967-0262
Source： European Journal of Phycology, Vol.42, Iss.3, 2007-08, pp. : 313-319
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Diatom classification is changing. We briefly discuss the history of diatom classification and comment on some of the most recent systems derived from the analysis of molecular data. Classification is not about "sources" of data, but the recognition of monophyletic groups based on evidence. We note that through recent history, with observations based on light microscopy, electron microscopy and molecular analysis, the creation of paraphyletic groups and their retention has been the tradition, leaving a natural classification of the group wanting. Replacing one paraphyletic system with another is a pointless exercise in authority. Congruence between phylogenetic analysis and classification may yield a dramatic restructuring of the classification of the diatoms, and that has implications for training future diatom researchers.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
Nova Hedwigia, Vol. 102, Iss. 1-2, 2016-02 ,pp. :
Paraphyletic taxa should be accepted
Taxon, Vol. 54, Iss. 1, 2005-02 ,pp. :
Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa
Taxon, Vol. 52, Iss. 4, 2003-11 ,pp. :