

Author: Efroymson Rebecca Sample Bradley Suter Glenn
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
ISSN: 1080-7039
Source: Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol.10, Iss.6, 2004-12, pp. : 1117-1127
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Risk assessors are often cautioned against the use of tests of highly bioavailable salt solutions added to soil to estimate the bioaccumulation of chemicals from waste site soils by plants. In this investigation, a large number of laboratory and field studies that measured the bioaccumulation of inorganic chemicals in plants were reviewed. The objective was to discern whether or not the relationship between the concentration of the element in aboveground vegetation and that in soil was different if the contamination was aged in the field rather than freshly added to soil in salt solution. For two of the eight elements, selenium and cadmium, salt solution experiments were associated with greater soil-plant uptake ratios than field measurements. Thus, these are not reliable data for use in the derivation of plant uptake regressions for screening-level ecological risk assessments at field sites. In contrast, the plant uptake of arsenic, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc, when added in salt solutions, was generally within the 95%prediction limit of regressions derived from field data. Chemical form, plant taxon, soil type, experimental methodology, and aging may be as important as the source of the chemical in predicting plant uptake of inorganic chemicals from soil.
Related content


Inorganic Soil Contamination from Cemetery Leachate
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, Vol. 117, Iss. 1-4, 2000-01 ,pp. :


Inorganic Soil Contamination from Cemetery Leachate
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, Vol. 117, Iss. 1, 2000-01 ,pp. :


Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, Vol. 45, Iss. 2, 2010-02 ,pp. :

