A Field Comparison of Methods for Estimating Nitrifier Maximum Specific Growth Rate in Treatment Plant Design – The Case Against WERF's High F/M Method

By Simm Robert A.   Reed B.   Hentz L.  

Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2008, Iss. 13, 2008-01 ,pp. : 3228-3239

Water Environment Federation

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Methods to Evaluate Nitrification Kinetics: WERF “High F/M” and “Low F/M” Protocols

By Mohammed-Jones K.   Bott C.   Kochaba T.  

Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2009, Iss. 15, 2009-01 ,pp. : 2305-2327

Water Environment Federation

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Methods to Evaluate Nitrification Kinetics: WERF “High F/M” and “Low F/M” Protocols

By Mohammed-Jones K.   Bott C.   Kochaba T.  

Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2009, Iss. 4, 2009-01 ,pp. : 880-902

Water Environment Federation

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Nitrification Rate Testing using WERF's High F/M Protocol: Lessons Learned

By Pope Rod   Winters David   Smith Fran   Melcer Henryk   Bratby John   Parker Denny   Levesque Scott   Owens Ashley  

Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2004, Iss. 12, 2004-01 ,pp. : 84-95

Water Environment Federation

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Using IFAS to Meet the Challenges of Significant Wet Weather Flows, Low Nitrifier Growth Rate and High rDON to Achieve Biological Nutrient Removal

By Basu Saibal   Szoke Nick   Borlace Bill   Comeau Jerry  

Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2009, Iss. 12, 2009-01 ,pp. : 4462-4463

Water Environment Federation

Access to resources Recommend Favorite