SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS

pp.：  1 – 50

EDITORIAL BOARD

pp.：  2 – 3

Copyright

pp.：  4 – 4

CONTENTS

pp.：  5 – 10

CONTRIBUTORS

pp.：  11 – 12

INTRODUCTION LONG-DISTANCE REFLEXIVES: THE STATE OF THE ART

pp.：  13 – 50

GRAMMATICAL AND DISCOURSE CONDITIONS ON LONG DISTANCE REFLEXIVES IN TWO CHINESE DIALECTS

pp.：  51 – 96

1. INTRODUCTION: APPROACHES TO LONG DISTANCE REFLEXIVES

pp.：  51 – 53

2. LOGOPHORIC CONDITIONS ON LD REFLEXIVES IN MANDARIN AND TEOCHEW

pp.：  54 – 55

3. SUBCOMMANDING ANTECEDENTS OF LD REFLEXIVES AND SOURCE/SELF REQUIREMENTS ON ANTECEDENTS

pp.：  56 – 57

4. MODIFYING PHRASES AS TESTS FOR SOURCE/SELF

pp.：  58 – 59

5. ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE ON THE ROLE OF SELF

pp.：  60 – 60

6. PIVOT RESTRICTIONS

pp.：  61 – 65

7. LOGOPHORICITY AND ATTITUDES DE SE

pp.：  66 – 68

8. THE SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF ATTITUDES DESE

pp.：  69 – 72

9. THE BINDING THEORETICAL STATUS OF LD REFLEXIVES

pp.：  73 – 74

10. THE C-COMMAND REQUIREMENT

pp.：  75 – 75

11. VP ELLIPSIS

pp.：  76 – 77

12. THE BLOCKING EFFECT REVISITED

pp.：  78 – 84

13. COUNTER EXAMPLES TO THE GRAMMATICAL ACCOUNT OF THE BLOCKING EFFECT

pp.：  85 – 85

14. CONCLUSION

pp.：  86 – 96

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  88 – 88

NOTES

pp.：  89 – 93

REFERENCES

pp.：  94 – 96

LONG-DISTANCE ANAPHORS IN HINDI/URDU: SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC ISSUES

pp.：  97 – 132

1. INTRODUCTION: NONLOCALLY BOUND ANAPHORIC EXPRESSIONS

pp.：  97 – 97

2. LEXICAL FORMS OF ANAPHORS AND INFLECTIONAL MORPHOLOGY

pp.：  98 – 101

3. OVERVIEW OF BINDING RELATIONS

pp.：  102 – 105

4. A HEAD-RAISING ACCOUNT FOR LONG-DISTANCE

pp.：  106 – 109

5. THE FUNCTIONAL PROJECTION HOST FOR REFLEXIVES

pp.：  110 – 117

6. SYNTACTIC/SEMANTIC FACTORS

pp.：  118 – 124

7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

pp.：  125 – 126

8. APPENDIX: OBJECT AGREEMENT AND SUBJECT ORIENTATION

pp.：  127 – 132

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  128 – 127

NOTES

pp.：  128 – 130

REFERENCES

pp.：  131 – 132

REFLEXIVE ANAPHOR OR CONJUNCTIVE OPERATOR: RIAU INDONESIAN SENDIRI

pp.：  133 – 168

1. WHY DO ONLY SOME LANGUAGES HAVE LONG-DISTANCE REFLEXIVES?

pp.：  133 – 134

2. RIAU INDONESIAN

pp.：  135 – 137

3. SENDIRI AS A REFLEXIVE ANAPHOR

pp.：  138 – 147

4. SENDIRI AS A CONJUNCTIVE OPERATOR

pp.：  148 – 155

5. GENERALIZING TO OTHER FORMS

pp.：  156 – 160

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  161 – 161

NOTES

pp.：  162 – 163

REFERENCES

pp.：  164 – 168

SYNTACTIC VS. LOGOPHORIC BINDING: EVIDENCE FROM NORWEGIAN CHILD LANGUAGE

pp.：  169 – 190

1. INTRODUCTION

pp.：  169 – 169

2. LOCAL VS. NONLOCAL (LOGOPHORIC) BINDING

pp.：  170 – 175

3. USING CHILD LANGUAGE AS EVIDENCE: AVRUTIN AND CUNNINGHAM (1997)

pp.：  176 – 177

4. EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM NORWEGIAN CHILD LANGUAGE

pp.：  178 – 187

5. CONCLUSION

pp.：  188 – 188

REFERENCES

pp.：  189 – 190

LOGOPHORICITV, ATTITUDES, AND ZIJI AT THE INTERFACE

pp.：  191 – 246

1. INTRODUCTION

pp.：  191 – 192

2. PREVIOUS ANALYSES

pp.：  193 – 203

3. ZIJI AS A LOGOPHOR

pp.：  204 – 215

4. ZIJI AS A (SYNTACTIC) ANAPHOR

pp.：  216 – 223

5. THE LONG DISTANCE ZIJI: SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS

pp.：  224 – 233

6. SUMMARY

pp.：  234 – 246

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  235 – 234

NOTES

pp.：  235 – 241

REFERENCES

pp.：  242 – 246

LOCAL AND LONG-DISTANCE REFLEXIVES IN TURKISH

pp.：  247 – 276

1. INTRODUCTION: TYPES OF MORPHOLOGICALLY FREE REFLEXIVES

pp.：  247 – 249

2. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE BARE AND THE INFLECTED REFLEXIVE

pp.：  250 – 250

3. THE NATURE OF THE INFLECTED REFLEXIVE: A LD-REFLEXIVE OR A PRONOUN?

pp.：  251 – 254

4. ELEMENTS OF A THIRD (OR FOURTH?) KIND

pp.：  255 – 261

5. THE BARE REFLEXIVE: ANAPHOR OR EMPHATIC PRONOUN?

pp.：  262 – 266

6. COMPLEX REFLEXIVES

pp.：  267 – 268

7. CONCLUSION

pp.：  269 – 276

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  270 – 269

NOTES

pp.：  270 – 273

REFERENCES

pp.：  274 – 276

ANTI-ANTI LOCALITY

pp.：  277 – 304

1. INTRODUCTION

pp.：  277 – 278

2. ANAPHORA IN KANNADA

pp.：  279 – 281

3. WHY APPARENT ANTILOCALITY IS NOT SYNTACTIC

pp.：  282 – 286

4. PREDICTIONS OF CONDITION R

pp.：  287 – 291

5. ALTERNATIVE ANALYSES

pp.：  292 – 299

6. CONCLUSIONS

pp.：  300 – 304

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  301 – 300

NOTES

pp.：  301 – 302

REFERENCES

pp.：  303 – 304

LONG-DISTANCE REFLEXIVIZATION IN CHECHEN AND INGUSH

pp.：  305 – 328

1. INTRODUCTION

pp.：  305 – 306

2. LOCAL REFLEXIVIZATION

pp.：  307 – 308

3. LOGOPHORIC REFLEXIVIZATION

pp.：  309 – 310

4. ORDINARY LONG-DISTANCE REFLEXIVIZATION

pp.：  311 – 323

5. CONCLUSION

pp.：  324 – 328

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  325 – 325

NOTES

pp.：  326 – 326

REFERENCES

pp.：  327 – 328

WHY THE BLOCKING EFFECT?

pp.：  329 – 366

1. INTRODUCTION

pp.：  329 – 329

2. THE BLOCKING EFFECT

pp.：  330 – 331

3. THE BLOCKING EFFECT IS NOT SYMMETRICAL

pp.：  332 – 335

4. PREVIOUS ANALYSES AND THEIR LIMITATIONS

pp.：  336 – 342

5. SELF-ASCRIPTION AND LONG-DISTANCE BOUND ZIJI

pp.：  343 – 354

6. DISCUSSION

pp.：  355 – 357

7. CONCLUSION

pp.：  358 – 366

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

pp.：  359 – 358

NOTES

pp.：  359 – 363

REFERENCES

pp.：  364 – 366

SYNTACTIC AND NONSYNTACTIC CONSTRAINTS ON LONG-DISTANCE REFLEXIVES

pp.：  367 – 392

1. INTRODUCTION

pp.：  367 – 369

2. SYNTACTIC AND NONSYNTACTIC REFLEXIVES

pp.：  370 – 377

3. NONSYNTACTIC CONDITIONS ON ZIJJ9

pp.：  378 – 384

4. CONCLUSION

pp.：  385 – 392

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

pp.：  388 – 387

NOTES

pp.：  388 – 389

REFERENCES

pp.：  390 – 392

ANAPHORS, LOGOPHORS, AND BINDING

pp.：  393 – 420

1. INTRODUCTION

pp.：  393 – 395

2. INTERPRETING SIG

pp.：  396 – 397

3. NON-C-COMMANDING ANTECEDENTS

pp.：  398 – 399

4. THE INTERPRETIVE PROCESS

pp.：  400 – 406

5. WHAT MAKES A PRONOMINAL INTERPRETATION OF SIG LOGOPHORIC?l3

pp.：  407 – 412

6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

pp.：  413 – 420

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

pp.：  414 – 413

NOTES

pp.：  414 – 417

REFERENCES

pp.：  418 – 420

INDEX

pp.：  421 – 430