Publisher: Bentham Science Publishers
E-ISSN: 1875-5631|11|1|11-27
ISSN: 1566-5232
Source: Current Gene Therapy, Vol.11, Iss.1, 2011-02, pp. : 11-27
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The importance of safer approaches for gene therapy has been underscored by a series of severe adverse events (SAEs) observed in patients involved in clinical trials for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency Disease (SCID) and Chromic Granulomatous Disease (CGD). While a new generation of viral vectors is in the process of replacing the classical gamma-retrovirus-based approach, a number of strategies have emerged based on non-viral vectorization and/or targeted insertion aimed at achieving safer gene transfer. Currently, these methods display lower efficacies than viral transduction although many of them can yield more than 1% engineered cells in vitro. Nuclease-based approaches, wherein an endonuclease is used to trigger site-specific genome editing, can significantly increase the percentage of targeted cells. These methods therefore provide a real alternative to classical gene transfer as well as gene editing. However, the first endonuclease to be in clinic today is not used for gene transfer, but to inactivate a gene (CCR5) required for HIV infection. Here, we review these alternative approaches, with a special emphasis on meganucleases, a family of naturally occurring rare-cutting endonucleases, and speculate on their current and future potential.
Related content
Targeted Genome Editing Tools for Disease Modeling and Gene Therapy
Current Gene Therapy, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, 2014-02 ,pp. :
Perspectives of Gene Therapy in Stem Cell Tissue Engineering
Cells Tissues Organs, Vol. 183, Iss. 4, 2006-12 ,pp. :
Gene Therapy and Targeted Toxins for Glioma
Current Gene Therapy, Vol. 5, Iss. 6, 2005-12 ,pp. :