

Author: Förster Hans
Publisher: Mohr Siebeck
E-ISSN: 1868-8020|5|4|419-440
ISSN: 1868-7032
Source: Early Christianity, Vol.5, Iss.4, 2014-12, pp. : 419-440
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The empty tomb narrative and related events in the Gospel of John (20:1–18) contain a segment that, in the context of the interpretation of this passage, is frequently the source of heated debate. After the “other disciple” enters the empty tomb, the text reports that he sees and believes. His belief is, however, immediately withdrawn in the next verse: “For they had not understood the Scripture that he must rise from the dead” (v.9). The present essay attempts to situate this segment in the broader context of the Fourth Gospel and, in doing so, demonstrates that the reference to “Scripture” presupposes a distinctively Johannine interpretation found elsewhere in the text.
Related content


Tradition Und Redaktion in Joh. 1 I9-36
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 1962-01 ,pp. :


Tradition Und Redaktion in Joh. I 19-36
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 5, Iss. 4, 1962-01 ,pp. :


Schrift als Grund und Grenze von Interpretation
Zeitschrift fuer Theologie und Kirche, Vol. 105, Iss. 2, 2008-06 ,pp. :


Das Wort Von Jesu Freunden (Joh. Xv, 13-16) Und Das Herrenmahl
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 3, Iss. 1-2, 1959-01 ,pp. :


Joh- 7.35 in Manis Lebensbeschreibung
By Bammel Ernst
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 15, Iss. 3, 1973-01 ,pp. :