Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN： 1346-8138|6|1|59-63
ISSN： 0385-2407
Source： THE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol.6, Iss.1, 1979-02, pp. : 59-63
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
ABSTRACTMass‐examination of all 31 employees of a chemical factory revealed that 20 of them were proved or suspected to have contact hypersensitivities to chemical substances used in the factory as follows: 12 cases were sensitive to 2‐amino‐4‐chlorophenol, 5 to para‐aminophenol, 2 to para‐dichloronitrobenzene, and 1 to para‐nitrophenol. Among the 5 compounds tested (including the above 4 substances and 3′‐chlorodiphenylamine‐2‐carboxylic acid), 2‐amino‐4‐chlorophenol was found to be an especially strong sensitizer.
Related content
INDUSTRIAL CONTACT DERMATITIS DUE TO NITRO AND AMINO DERIVATIVES
THE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol. 9, Iss. 5, 1982-10 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Contact Dermatitis Due to Sodium Colistimethate
THE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol. 25, Iss. 6, 1998-06 ,pp. :
A Case of Contact Dermatitis Due to Methylprednisolone
THE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol. 19, Iss. 6, 1992-06 ,pp. :
A Case of Contact Dermatitis Due to Betamethasone Valerate
THE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol. 13, Iss. 6, 1986-12 ,pp. :
Pigmented Contact Dermatitis Due to Musk Moskene
THE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Vol. 18, Iss. 7, 1991-07 ,pp. :