The MASTER trial: artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling

E-ISSN： 2044-3749|6|2|37-38

ISSN： 2044-3730

Source： TRENDS IN UROLOGY AND MEN'S HEALTH, Vol.6, Iss.2, 2015-03, pp. : 37-38

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The use of sling vs sphincter in post‐prostatectomy urinary incontinence

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Vol. 116, Iss. 3, 2015-09 ,pp. : 330-342

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Outcomes of single‐ vs double‐cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion in low‐ and high‐risk profile male patients with severe stress urinary incontinence

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Vol. 118, Iss. 4, 2016-10 ,pp. : 625-632

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Readjustable Transobturator Sling: A Novel Sling Procedure for Male Urinary Incontinence

Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 73, Iss. 4, 2004-12 ,pp. : 354-356

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Complications after AUS implantation with or without prior radiotherapy

BJU INTERNATIONAL, Vol. 115, Iss. 2, 2015-02 ,pp. : 300-307

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Use of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter to Manage Persistent Urethral Incontinence after an Ileovesicostomy

Current Urology, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2011-03 ,pp. : 54-56

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite