Rejoinder to Levine, Clare et al.'s Comparison of the Park–Levine Probability Model Versus Interpersonal Deception Theory: Application to Deception Detection

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1468-2958|41|3|327-349

ISSN： 0360-3989

Source： Human Communication Research, Vol.41, Iss.3, 2015-07, pp. : 327-349

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Base Rates, Deception Detection, and Deception Theory: A Reply to Burgoon (2015)

By  

Human Communication Research, Vol. 41, Iss. 3, 2015-07 ,pp. : 350-366

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Detection of Deception Within Investigative Contexts: Key Challenges and Core Issues

By  

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND OFFENDER PROFILING, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 2015-06 ,pp. : 107-118

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Disease genes: flattery and deception

By Cuthbert A.W.  

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Vol. 23, Iss. 11, 2002-11 ,pp. : 504-509

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Transparency, deception and trust

By  

Clinical Medicine, Vol. 2, Iss. 6, 2002-11 ,pp. : 595-596

Royal College Of Physicians

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The reality of psychomotor problems, and the possibility of Parkinson’s disorder, in some recreational ecstasy/MDMA users: a rejoinder to Sumnall et al. (2003)

By Parrott A.   Rodgers J.   Buchanan T.   Scholey A.   Heffernan T.   Ling J.  

Psychopharmacology, Vol. 171, Iss. 2, 2004-01 ,pp. : 231-233

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite