Description
Reason and Revelation before Historicism, the first full-length comparison of Strauss and Fackenheim,places the informal teacher and student in conversation alongside sections of their analyses of notable thinkers.
Chapter
1 Background and Introduction
Why Is There a Tension between Philosophy and Revelatory Theology?
The Tension between Philosophy and Revelatory Theology in Modern Western Thought
Strauss and Fackenheim on the Tension between Philosophy and Revelatory Theology in Modern Western Thought
The Tension between Philosophy and Revelation in Jewish Philosophy
The Dead End of Resolving Tension
Strauss and Fackenheim: Two Options to Restore Reason and Revelation
III. Development of Argument in Chapter Form
Overview of Book in Chapter Form
Strauss and Fackenheim: A Note on Methodology
2 Strauss’s Formulation of the Relationship between Reason and Revelation in Modern Thought and His Rejection of a Practical Synthesis
I. Strauss on Western Philosophy
Strauss on the Ancient Philosophers
II. Strauss on Jewish Philosophy
3 Fackenheim’s Formulation of the Relationship between Philosophy and Revelatory Theology in Modern Thought
I. Fackenheim on Western Philosophy
II. Fackenheim on Jewish Philosophy
III. Fackenheim’s Synthesis
Fackenheim’s Synthesis of Revelatory Religion and Philosophy
4 The Problem of Historicism
The Necessity of ‘Openness’ in Philosophic and/or Religious Thought
The Problem of Historicism: Strauss’s Return to Natural Right
The Problem of Historicism: Fackenheim the Philosopher’s Return to History
The Problem of Historicism: Fackenheim the Theologian’s Return to History
5 Reason and Revelation: Jewish Thought after Strauss and Fackenheim
Strauss: Jerusalem and Athens
Fackenheim’s Rejection of the Return to Greek Thought
Results from Beginning with Fackenheim’s Position
The Present Writer’s Position