A Conflict of Principles :The Battle Over Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan

Publication subTitle :The Battle Over Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan

Author: Cohen > Carl  

Publisher: University Press of Kansas‎

Publication year: 2014

E-ISBN: 9780700620432

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9780700619962

Subject: D90 theory of law (jurisprudence);D91 Legal departments;D913 民法;D923 civil law

Keyword: 法律

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Description

"No state . . . shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." So says the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, a document held dear by Carl Cohen, a professor of philosophy and longtime champion of civil liberties who has devoted most of his adult life to the University of Michigan. So when Cohen discovered, after encountering some resistance, how his school, in its admirable wish to increase minority enrollment, was actually practicing a form of racial discrimination—calling it "affirmative action"—he found himself at odds with his longtime allies and colleagues in an effort to defend the equal treatment of the races at his university. In A Conflict of Principles Cohen tells the story of what happened at Michigan, how racial preferences were devised and implemented there, and what was at stake in the heated and divisive controversy that ensued. He gives voice to the judicious and seldom heard liberal argument against affirmative action in college admission policies.

In the early 1970s, as a member of the Board of Directors of the American Civil Liberties Union, Cohen vigorously supported programs devised to encourage the recruitment of minorities in colleges, and in private employment. But some of these efforts gave deliberate preference to blacks and Hispanics seeking university admission, and this Cohen recognized as a form of racism, however well-meaning. In his book he recounts the fortunes of

Chapter

3. From The Nation to Commentary

4. From Washington to Berlin and Beyond

5. Naked Racial Preference

6. The University of Michigan Comes into Focus

7. Confrontation

8. Pulling Teeth

9. Revelation

10. Further Revelations

11. What Was I to Do?

12. Point of No Return

13. On to the Federal Courts

14. The Climate of Opinion at Michigan

15. The Reading Room

16. Moving Targets

17. Intervenors

18. The Thin Line between Permissible and Impermissible

19. 128 Honorary Degrees and a Coat Check

20. The Heart of the Trial: 257 to 1

21. Vindication

22. Petitions Don't Decide Lawsuits

23. Why It Smelled Funny

24. Back on the Home Front

25. Some Personal Questions

26. Preparing for the Big Event

27. The Big Event

28. The End of Litigation

29. From Legal Battles to Political Battles: The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative Is Born

30. Defending the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative

31. The Constitution of Michigan Amended

32. Race Preference at the University of Texas

33. Race Preference in Michigan Is Permanently Ended

Appendix A: Freedom of Information Act Requests

Appendix B: The Cohen Report, 20 March 1996

Appendix C: The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI)

Notes

Index

Back Cover

The users who browse this book also browse