Deliberative Politics in Action :Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse ( Theories of Institutional Design )

Publication subTitle :Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse

Publication series :Theories of Institutional Design

Author: Jürg Steiner;André Bächtiger;Markus Spörndli;Marco R. Steenbergen;  

Publisher: Cambridge University Press‎

Publication year: 2005

E-ISBN: 9781316904350

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9780521828710

P-ISBN(Hardback):  9780521828710

Subject: D0 Political Theory

Keyword: 政治、法律

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Description

The first empirical study of the role of conversation and arguments in politics, based on analysis of parliamentary debates. This study of deliberative politics provides the first extended empirical analysis of the role of conversation and arguments in politics. Examining parliamentary debates in Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States, the authors measure the preconditions and consequences of high level deliberation. This study of deliberative politics provides the first extended empirical analysis of the role of conversation and arguments in politics. Examining parliamentary debates in Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States, the authors measure the preconditions and consequences of high level deliberation. 'Deliberative politics' refers to the role of conversation and arguments in politics. Until recently discussion of deliberative politics took place almost exclusively among political philosophers, but many questions raised in this philosophical discussion cry out for empirical investigation. This book provides the first extended empirical study of deliberative politics, addressing, in particular, questions of the preconditions and consequences of high level deliberation. Using parliamentary debates in Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States as an empirical base, the authors measure the level of deliberation by constructing a 'Discourse Quality Index'. As deliberative politics moves to the forefront of political theory, this book makes an important contribution to deliberative democracy. Introduction: the research questions; 1. Institutions and behaviour: the example of consociational theory; 2. The philosophical literature on deliberative politics; 3. Measuring deliberation: a Discourse Quality Index; 4. Understanding the real world of deliberation: hypotheses about antecedents and consequences; 5. The institutional antecedents of discourse; 6. Discourse and its consequences; Conclusion and research outlook; Appendix: Discourse Quality Index (DQI). 'The authors of Deliberative Politics in Action provide an extensive review of the literature on deliberative democracy … impressive research effort.' European Political Science 'The most systematic attempt to operationalize principles for identifying and evaluating deliberation is at the center of the study of parliamentary discourse by Steiner and his associates.' Dennis F. Thompson, Department of Government, Harvard University

Chapter

2 The philosophical literature on deliberative politics

Normative theories of deliberative politics

Historical roots of the deliberative model

Criticism of the deliberative model

3 Measuring deliberation: a Discourse Quality Index

Empirical studies on deliberation

The construction of a Discourse Quality Index (DQI)

Participation

Level of justification

Content of justifications

Respect

Constructive politics

A reliability test of the DQI

Participation

Level of justification

Content of justification

Respect toward groups

Respect toward demands

Respect toward counterarguments

Constructive politics

Further reliability tests of the DQI

4 Understanding the real world of deliberation: hypotheses about antecedents and consequences

A theoretical framework

Institutional and issue antecedents of political discourse

Consensus versus competitive democracy

The role of veto points/players

Presidential versus parliamentary systems

First versus second chambers

Public versus non-public arenas

Polarized versus non-polarized issues

Outcomes of political discourse

Formal consequences of deliberation

Substantive consequences of deliberation

5 Antecedents of deliberation: institutions and issues

Research design

Case selection

Legislatures

Debates

Measures

Predictors

Dependent variable: discourse quality

Consensus versus competition

The role of veto players

Presidential versus parliamentary systems

First versus second chambers

Public versus non-public arenas

The role of polarization

Conclusions

6 Discourse and its Consequences

Research design

Context: the German Mediation Committee

Case selection

Measures of the formal dimension of outcomes

Measures of the substantive dimension of outcomes

Measures of the discourse quality

Results for the formal dimension of outcomes

Results for the substantive dimension of outcomes

Conclusions

Conclusion and research outlook

Appendix Discourse Quality Index (DQI): instructions for coders

Participation

Code 0: interruption of a speaker

Code 1: normal participation is possible

Level of justification for demands

Code 0: no justification

Code 1: inferior justification

Code 2: qualified justification

Code 3: sophisticated justification

Content of justification for demands

Code 0: explicit statement concerning constituency or group interests

Code 1: neutral statement

Code 2a: explicit statement of the common good in utilitarian or collective terms

Code 2b: explicit statement of the common good in terms of the difference principle

Respect toward groups to be helped (empathy)

Code 0: no respect

Code 1: neutral

Code 2: explicit respect

Respect toward the demands of others

Code 0: no respect

Code 1: neutral

Code 2: explicit respect

Respect toward counterarguments

Code 0: counterarguments are ignored

Code 1: counterarguments are included but explicitly degraded

Code 2: counterarguments are included – neutral

Code 3: counterarguments are included and at least one of them is explicitly valued

Constructive politics

Code 0: positional politics

Code 1: alternative proposal

Code 2: mediating proposal

References

Index

The users who browse this book also browse