Responsiveness of quality of life instruments for the comparison of minimally invasive cholecystectomy procedures

Author： Bingener Juliane Ghahfarokhi Leili Skaran Pamela Sloan Jeff

ISSN： 0930-2794

Source： Surgical Endoscopy, Vol.27, Iss.7, 2013-07, pp. : 2446-2453

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Treatment of varicocele with reference to age: a retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive procedures

By Beutner S. May M. Hoschke B. Helke C. Lein M. Roigas J. Johannsen M.

Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, 2007-01 ,pp. : 61-65

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of the minimally invasive and ilioinguinal approaches for periacetabular osteotomy 263 single-surgeon procedures in well-defined study groups

By Troelsen Anders Elmengaard Brian Søballe Kjeld

Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 79, Iss. 6, 2008-12 ,pp. : 777-784

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Exploring the role of minimally invasive treatment strategies in early rectal cancer: the significance of functional outcome and quality of life

By Hompes Roel

Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, 2012-02 ,pp. : 582-583

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Single-port Cholecystectomy and Quality of Life

By Cotton Michael

World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 38, Iss. 1, 2014-01 ,pp. : 264-264

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite