Related content

Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction

By Garry D.   Figueroa R.   Kalish R. B.   Catalano C. J.   Maulik D.  

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 2003-04 ,pp. : 254-259

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial

By Denguezli Walid   Trimech Adnene   Haddad Anis   Hajjaji Awatef   Saidani Zahra   Faleh Raja   Sakouhi Mohamed  

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 276, Iss. 2, 2007-08 ,pp. : 119-124

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction or Labour

By Deshmukh Varsha   Yelikar Kanan   Waso Vandana  

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, Vol. 63, Iss. 5, 2013-10 ,pp. : 321-324

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening/labor induction

By Ramsey P. S.   Ogburn P. L.   Harris D. Y.   Heise R. H.   DiMarco C. S.   Ramin K. D.  

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 2003-04 ,pp. : 250-253

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone for the management of missed abortion

By Thwaini Al Inizi S.A.   Ezimokhai M.  

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 83, Iss. 1, 2003-10 ,pp. : 73-74

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite