Bad Science, Sloppy Reporting, and Retracted Publications: Should Peer Review be the Scapegoat?

ISSN： 1096-4673

Source： Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol.35, Iss.6, 2014-06, pp. : 411-412

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

How Accurate is Subjective Reporting of Childhood Sleep Patterns? A Review of the Literature and Implications for Practice

Current Pediatric Reviews, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2008-05 ,pp. : 132-142

Bentham Science Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Serious neurological conditions following pertussis immunization: an analysis of endotoxin levels, the vaccine adverse events reporting system (VAERS) database and literature review

By Geier David A. Geier Mark R.

Pediatric Rehabilitation, Vol. 5, Iss. 3, 2002-07 ,pp. : 177-182

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Peer Conflict

Journal of Dentistry for Children, Vol. 66, Iss. 1, 1999-01 ,pp. : 16-16

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sibling relationship and peer response

International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, Vol. , Iss. , 2017-01 ,pp. : 56-55

Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Abstracts of Electronic Publications in this Issue

Pediatric Dentistry, Vol. 36, Iss. 4, 2014-07 ,pp. : 284-284

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

Access to resources Recommend Favorite