Crimes against Peace and International Law ( Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law )

Publication series :Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law

Author: Kirsten Sellars;  

Publisher: Cambridge University Press‎

Publication year: 2013

E-ISBN: 9781316892930

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9781107028845

P-ISBN(Hardback):  9781107028845

Subject: D995 international law of war (war)

Keyword: 法律

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Description

A legal and historical analysis of the first modern attempts to prosecute national leaders for embarking upon aggressive war. Kirsten Sellars analyses the Allies' prosecution of the German and Japanese leaders for 'crimes against peace' - planning and waging aggressive war - at the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals in the mid-1940s. This legal experiment is still relevant, especially to lawyers, policy-makers and scholars engaged in international law and international relations today. Kirsten Sellars analyses the Allies' prosecution of the German and Japanese leaders for 'crimes against peace' - planning and waging aggressive war - at the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals in the mid-1940s. This legal experiment is still relevant, especially to lawyers, policy-makers and scholars engaged in international law and international relations today. In 1946, the judges at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg declared 'crimes against peace' - the planning, initiation or waging of aggressive wars - to be 'the supreme international crime'. At the time, the prosecuting powers heralded the charge as being a legal milestone, but it later proved to be an anomaly arising from the unique circumstances of the post-war period. This study traces the idea of criminalising aggression, from its origins after the First World War, through its high-water mark at the post-war tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo, to its abandonment during the Cold War. Today, a similar charge - the 'crime of aggression' - is being mooted at the International Criminal Court, so the ideas and debates that shaped the original charge of 'crimes against peace' assume new significance and offer valuable insights to lawyers, policy-makers and scholars engaged in international law and international relations. 1. The emergence of the idea of aggression; 2. The quest for control; 3. The creation of a crime; 4. Innovation and orthodoxy at Nuremberg; 5. The Allies and an ad hoc charge; 6. The elimination of Japanese militarism; 7. Questions of self-defence; 8. Divisions on the bench at Tokyo; 9. The uncertain legacy of crimes against peace; Postscript. 'Sellars does a masterful job. Drawing heavily on period documents, many of them unpublished at the time, she provides a highly readable account of the fits and starts that accompanied the emergence of the notion that individuals may be prosecuted for a war of aggression.' John B. Quigley, International Affairs 'Sellars does an excellent job of highlighting the various controversies and personality clashes that almost scuttled [the] early, and flawed, experiments in international criminal justice. She succeeds in synthesizing a narrative … in which the pertinent questions of international law … are placed in the context of great power politics.' Victor Kattan, Journal of International Criminal Justice '[This] book is more than a history of aggression; the product of comprehensive and in-depth archival research from an enviable range of sources, it is also an excellent general history of the development of international criminal law itself. There are many good books on the road to international criminal law, but if you were to read just one, I would recommend this. Its lucid pungent analysis makes it a pleasure to read.' Neil Boister, Te Piringa Faculty of Law, University of Waikato 'There are many good books on the road to international criminal law, but if you were to read just one, I would recommend this. Its lucid pungent analysis makes it

Chapter

The Protocol and its critics

The significance of the Kellogg–Briand Pact

The expansive concept of self-defence

‘A bell sans tongue, a saw sans teeth’

The renewed search for a definition

An objective standard

Aggression through proxies

Washington and ‘qualified neutrality’

No moves towards criminalisation

2 The quest for control

The ascendancy of Vishinsky

The messages of the Kharkov trial

Trainin returns to aggression

Enter UNWCC

The evolution of American policy

Constructing the trial plan

The British make their stand

Law and politics

3 The creation of a crime

The question of individual responsibility

The problem of aggression

The issue of retroactivity

Excising the causes of war

The debate about definition

More limits on aggression

The ‘common plan or conspiracy’ proposal

A new legal regime

The timing of the charge

4 Innovation and orthodoxy at Nuremberg

Jackson on custom

Maintaining the status quo

The British approach

The defence responds

Shawcross answers the defence

The French and the ‘chain of crimes’

The jurists join the debate

A revolution in law

5 The Allies and an ad hoc charge

Charges and counter-charges

The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact in court

Norway and the violation of neutrality

The drafting of the Judgment

Judgment on the ‘supreme’ crime

The meaning of the sentences

The critics of selectivity

The ‘Nürnberg Principles’ and opponents

6 The elimination of militarism

The British involvement

The drafting of the Charter

The creation of the Indictment

A unique war?

The dual purpose of conspiracy

‘Plain ordinary murderers’

Final decisions

7 Questions of self-defence

Innovation serves orthodoxy, again

Crimes against peace and opinio juris

Kellogg and self-defence

The ideological battle

Economic strangulation and military encirclement

The prosecution wavers

Clashes with the Soviets

The changing landscape

8 Divisions on the bench at Tokyo

Threats of resignations

MacArthur and the Acting President

The drafts of the Judgment

The historical analysis

One majority judgment and five opinions

Critics of the aggression charge

The final verdicts

A trial out of time

The limits of the law

9 The uncertain legacy of ‘crimes against peace’

The Soviets reprise Litvinov’s definition

Cold War debates

The emergence of the non-aligned states

The Goa effect

Debates about a definition

Objective and subjective criteria

No revival of crimes against peace

The self-determination exception

The tide ebbs on Tokyo dissents

Postscript

The ICC and the issue of sovereignty

States and vital interests

Bibliography

Primary sources

Archives

Official or primary records

Secondary sources

Books and journals

Newspapers

Index

Series

The users who browse this book also browse


No browse record.