Chapter
4 Hennigian systematics in France, a historical approach with glimpses of sociology
Unnoticed conflict between Hennigian and pattern cladistics in the 1980s
4.3 Present cladistic debates
5.2 What does it mean to be a “Hennigian”?
5.4 Hennig: realist or empiricist?
5.5 The inconsistency of parsimony: what would Willi do?
5.6 The realist philosophy of model-based approaches
5.7 What is branch length?
5.8 Parsimony, simplicity, models and coherence
5.9 The Hennigian aesthetic of heuristic accessibility
6 How much of Hennig is in present day cladistics?
6.1 The ‘father of cladistics’
6.2 Sources for comparison
6.4 Concept of ‘relationship’
6.5 Concept of ‘monophyly’
6.6 Concept of ‘apomorphy’
6.7 Principles of grouping
6.8 Method of polarising characters
6.10 Concept of ‘homology’
6.12 Concept of ‘species as individuals’
6.13 Use of the term ‘phylogeny’
6.14 Graphical representations and their meaning
7 The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations
7.1 Walter Zimmermann and phylogenetic systematics
7.2 The positioning of Willi Hennig as a theoretician
7.3 Hennig’s early theoretical papers: 1947–1950
7.4 The recognition of paraphyletic groups
7.5 The fate of taxonomic ranks in Hennig’s writings
7.6 Hennig’s first phylogeny book (Hennig 1950a)
7.7 Developing the theory of phylogenetic systematics...
7.8 Finalizing the procedures of phylogenetic systematics (Hennig 1957)
7.10 Fossils and phylogeny reconstruction
7.12 Misunderstandings and unjustified criticisms
7.13 Looking backwards in search of the future
8 What we all learned from Hennig
9 Semaphoronts: the elements of biological systematics
9.3 Hologenetic relationships
Ontogenetic relationships
Tokogenetic relationships
Phylogenetic relationships
Hologenetic relationships
9.4 Semaphoronts, character, and homology
9.5 Semaphoronts, phylogenetics, and developmental evolution
9.6 Semaphoronts, phylogenetics, and phylogenomics
10 Why should cladograms be dichotomous?
10.2 The temptation of an empirical foundation
Brundin’s clearly empirical foundation
10.3 The principle of dichotomy as a requirement of scientific methodology
Platnick’s Popperian attempt
Nelson and Platnick: the cladogram as an analytic tool
Nomological incommensurability
Homologues, homology, characters, taxa, and cladograms
11 Hennig’s auxiliary principle and reciprocal illumination revisited
11.2 Hennig’s auxiliary principle and reciprocal illumination...
11.3 Changing principles (and their implications)
11.4 Hennig’s auxiliary principle and parsimony
11.5 Congruence and testing
11.6 Hierarchy in characters
12 Dispersalism and neodispersalism
12.2 Dispersal and dispersion
12.3 Dispersal as the default explanation in biogeography (1949–1988)
The role of the South Atlantic Basin in biogeography and evolution, New York City, 19493
Mayr’s ‘methodological principle’ or, the immunity of biological conclusions to geological evidence
Pacific Basin Biogeography, Honolulu, Hawai’i, 19616
Biogéographie et liaisons intercontinentales au cours du Mésozoique, Monaco 19729
Biogeography: the 21st Systematics Symposium, Missouri Botanical Garden, 197410
Vicariance Biogeography Symposium, New York City, 197912
Alternative Hypotheses in Biogeography, Seattle, Washington, 198019
Evolution, Time and Space: The Emergence of the Biosphere, London 198120
Dispersal and distribution: An International Symposium, Hamburg 198224
Biogeography of the Tropical Pacific, Honolulu, Hawaii, 198225
Symposium on Biogeography and Plate Tectonics in the SW Pacific, Dunedin 198327
Vicariance Biogeography: Theory, Methods and Application New Orleans 198728
National Museum Symposium on the Panbiogeography of New Zealand, Wellington 198829
12.4 Doctrinaire vicariance, doctrinaire dispersal
13 Molecular data in systematics: a promise fulfilled, a future beckoning
13.4 Dating the tree of life
14 Hennig, Løvtrup, evolution and biology
14.2 Evolution as idea and cosmogony
14.3 On biological antitheses especially preformation and epigenesis
14.4 Hennig: a preformationist?
14.5 Løvtrup: the epigeneticist
14.6 On the nature of organisms: the biological continuity
14.7 On leaving evolutionary materialism behind
14.8 The eternal species problem
14.9 The problem of individuality
14.10 The multiplicity problem
15 Willi Hennig as philosopher
15.2 Hennig’s major philosophical sources: Bertalanffy and Ziehen
15.3 The mathesis universalis of systematics
15.4 The enkaptic hierarchy
15.5 The cladogram, a Carnapian structure description
16 Hennig and hierarchies
16.2 Relations and hierarchies
16.3 Relations and division hierarchies
16.5 Division hierarchies pictured
16.6 Gregg, Woodger, and sets
16.7 Phylogenetic systematics
17 Chain, tree, and network: the development of phylogenetic systematics...
17.1 Introduction: pattern and process in object diversity
17.2 Classification and phylogeny in biological systematics...
17.3 Generalized pattern cladistics as a science of trees and networks...
17.4 Phylogeny estimation in manuscript stemmatics...
17.5 Axiomatic methods in systematics: Principia Mathematica and its followers
17.6 Abductive inference in systematics in biology, stemmatics...
18 The relational view of phylogenetic hypotheses...
18.2 Mathematical concepts
Relation and relational structure
Classification and classificatory structure
18.3 Evolution, phylogeny, and phylogenetic hypotheses
The explanation of the diversity of life
The intra-LITU/inter-LITU distinction
The principle of phylogenetics
Phylogeny and phylogenetic hypotheses
18.4 Phylogenetics hypotheses: from relations to classifications
On the concepts of kinship in phylogenetics
On two fundamental mathematical equivalences
Phylogenetic hypotheses as relational structures
Relational properties of the Concepts of Kinship
Simple kinship relationship
Ancestor-descendant relationship
Degree of kinship relationship
Consequences in terms of classification
Simple and degree of kinship relationships
Ancestor-descendant Relationship
18.5 Concerning some consequences and related topics
On the methodology of phylogenetics
Simple kinship relationship and non-polarized characters
Fully ramified undirected n-trees and quaternary relations
18.6 On the degree of kinship relationship
19 This struggle for survival: systematic biology and institutional leadership
19.1 Systematic biology and scientific rigor
19.3 A challenge to institutional leaders