Chapter
BOP LACKS DATA NEEDED TO PERFORM A METHODOLOGICALLY SOUND COST COMPARISON AND IS NOT POSITIONED TO EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES FOR CONFINING INMATES IN LOW AND MINIMUM SECURITY FACILITIES
A Cost Comparison Is Not Currently Feasible because BOP Lacks Data Needed to Perform a Methodologically Sound Comparison
BOP Cannot Evaluate whether Privately Contracted Facilities Provide Better or Worse Value than Other Low and Minimum Security Confinement
RECOMMENDATION FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
AGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION
APPENDIX I: OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX II: COMMENTS FROM THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Chapter 2 PRISON CONSTRUCTION∗
Developing Initial Project Cost Estimates
Project Delays Contributed to Increased Cost Estimates, and the Imprecise Nature of Estimates Was Not Communicated to ongress and Other Stakeholders
Problems with Site Selection and the Availability of Funding Contributed to Project Construction Delays
FCI Berlin and FCI McDowell
Construction Costs Increased at a Rate Higher Than the Rate of Inflation
Cost Estimates Are Imprecise, and Congress and Other Stakeholders Were Not Informed of the Extent to Which They Might Vary
BOP Has Eliminated or Reduced Portions of Two Projects, and Plans to Use Its Construction Management Policies Procedures to Control Cost and Schedule Changes
BOP Has Eliminated or Reduced Facilities at FCI Berlin and FCI Mendota, but Did Not Clearly Communicate These Changes to Congress and Other Stakeholders
BOP Plans to Use Its Policies and Procedures to Control Cost Increases and Schedule Delays during Construction
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION
APPENDIX I: OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY
APPENDIX II: FCI MENDOTA, FCI BERLIN, AND FCI MCDOWELL: PROJECT ESTIMATES, BUDGET REQUESTS, AND FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEARS 2001–2009
APPENDIX III: COMMENTS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS