Computational Models of Argument :Proceedings of COMMA 2012 ( Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications )

Publication subTitle :Proceedings of COMMA 2012

Publication series : Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Author: Verheij B.;Szeider S.;Woltran S.  

Publisher: Ios Press‎

Publication year: 2012

E-ISBN: 9781614991113

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9781614991106

Subject: D913 民法

Keyword: 自动化技术、计算机技术

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Description

The subject of argumentation has been studied since ancient times, but it has seen major innovations since the advent of the computer age. Software already exists which can create and evaluate arguments in high-stake situations, such as medical diagnosis and criminal investigation; formal systems can help us appreciate the role of the value judgments which underlie opposing positions; and it is even possible to enter into argumentative dialogues as if playing a computer game. This book presents the 28 full papers, 17 short papers and a number of system demonstrations, described in an extended abstract, from the 2012 biennial Computational Models of Argument (COMMA) conference, held in Vienna, Austria. Papers by the invited speakers Professor Trevor Bench-Capon, Professor Erik Krabbe and Professor Keith Stenning are also included. This year, for the first time, COMMA invited the submission of papers for an innovative applications track, and those which were accepted for presentation are included in this volume. Argumentation can be studied from many angles, including the artificial, natural and theoretical systems perspective. Presentations at the 2012 conference addressed the subject from these perspectives and many more.

Chapter

Semi-Automated Argumentative Analysis of Online Product Reviews

Arguing with Preferences in EcoBioCap

An Analysis and Hypothesis Generation Platform for Heterogeneous Cancer Databases

Making Sense of Macro- and Micro-Argumentation in Policy-Deliberation: Visualisation Techniques and Representation Formats

Towards an Argument-Based Music Recommender System

Arguing About Firewall Policy

Part III. Regular Papers

A General QBF-Based Formalization of Abstract Argumentation Theory

Some Foundations for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation

Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results

The Equational Approach to CF2 Semantics

Argumentation Games for Admissibility and Cogency Criteria

Uniform Argumentation Frameworks

Dishonest Arguments in Debate Games

On the Use of Presumptions in Structured Defeasible Reasoning

Automated Deployment of Argumentation Protocols

On Preferred Extension Enumeration in Abstract Argumentation

Towards Experimental Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation

A Dialogue Game for Coalition Structure Generation with Self-Interested Agents

Complexity of Logic-Based Argumentation in Schaefer's Framework

Argumentation Dialogues for Two-Agent Conflict Resolution

Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics

Computational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics

Tactics and Concessions for Argumentation-Based Negotiation

Default Reasoning About Actions via Abstract Argumentation

Resolutions in Structured Argumentation

Mechanism Design for Argumentation-Based Persuasion

Persuasion Strategies for Argumentation About Plans

Selecting Extensions in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks

Group Persuasion Through Uncertain Audience Modelling

On Input/Output Argumentation Frameworks

Dialogue Templates for Automatic Argument Processing

Valued-Based Argumentation for Tree-Like Value Graphs

Interchanging Arguments Between Carneades and AIF

Towards Argument-Based Foundation for Sceptical and Credulous Dialogue Games

The Structure of Ad Hominem Dialogues

Towards Argumentation About Subjective Probabilities

Argument Schemes for Reasoning About Trust

Clarifying Some Misconceptions on the ASPIC+ Framework

Generating Abstract Arguments: A Natural Language Approach

Towards Argumentation with Symbolic Dempster-Shafer Evidence

Conditional Acceptance Functions

Grounded Semantics as Persuasion Dialogue

Picking the Right Expert to Make a Debate Uncontroversial

Part IV. Demonstrations

The Synergy: A Platform for Argumentation-Based Group Decision Making

Critiquing Justifications for Action Using a Semantic Model: Demonstration

Evaluating Abstract Dialectical Frameworks with ASP

dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool

TOAST: Online ASPIC+ Implementation

Implementing ArguBlogging

Dialogues on the Argument Web: Mixed Initiative Argumentation with Arvina

AIFdb: Infrastructure for the Argument Web

The Carneades Web Service

Argumentation-Based Reinforcement Learning for RoboCup Keepaway

Author Index

The users who browse this book also browse


No browse record.