Comparison of Occupational Exposure Using Three Different Methods: Hygiene Panel, Job Exposure Matrix (JEM), and Self Reports

Author： Benke G. Sim M. Fritschi L. Aldred G. Forbes A. Kauppinen T.

Publisher： Taylor & Francis Ltd

ISSN： 1521-0898

Source： Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol.16, Iss.1, 2001-01, pp. : 84-91

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Comparison of Formaldehyde Exposure Levels in Two Multi-Industry Occupational Exposure Databanks Using Multimodel Inference

By Lavoue J. Gerin M. Vincent R.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. : 38-48

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Validation of a Job-Exposure Matrix for Assessment of Utility Worker Exposure to Magnetic Fields

By Johansen Christoffer Raaschou-Nielsen Ole Skotte Jørgen Thomsen Birthe L. Olsen Jørgen H.

Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, 2002-04 ,pp. : 304-310

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Occupational Exposure

By Sterzl-Eckert H. Greim H.

Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 34, Iss. 11, 1996-11 ,pp. : 1177-1178

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Validity of self-reported occupational noise exposure

By Schlaefer Klaus Schlehofer Brigitte Schüz Joachim

European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 24, Iss. 8, 2009-08 ,pp. : 469-475

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Comparison of Sampling and Analytical Methods for Assessing Occupational Exposure to Diesel Exhaust in a Railroad Work Environment

By Verma Dave K. Shaw Lorraine Julian Jim Smolynec Kathy Wood Chris Shaw Don

Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 14, Iss. 10, 1999-10 ,pp. : 701-714

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite