Related content

Standing Space Only in the CJEU: Comment on Inuit TapiriitKanatami v European Parliament and Council

By Jones Joseph  

Judicial Review, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, 2014-03 ,pp. : 65-72

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Defending Restricted Standing for Individuals to Bring Direct Actions Against ‘Legislative’ Measures: Court of Justice of the European Union Decision of 3 October 2013 in Case C-583/11 P, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v. European Parliament and Council

By  

European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 2015-01 ,pp. : 481-499

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Court of Justice of the European Union (General Chamber), Judicial review of EU Acts after the Treaty of Lisbon; Order of 6 September 2011, Case T-18/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v. Commission Judgment of 25 October 2011, Case T-262/10 Microban v. Commission

By  

European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2012-04 ,pp. : 82-104

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Bridging the Care Gap: Robertson v Fife Council and Paying for Residential Care

By  

Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 2003-1 ,pp. : 118-123

Edinburgh University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Transco plc v Glasgow City Council: Developing Enrichment Law after Shilliday

By Whitty Niall R  

Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 2006-1 ,pp. : 113-132

Edinburgh University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite