Related content

Ought, obligation and duty 1 I am indebted to Prof. P. Herbst for helpful discussions on this subject, and to Dr. J. Burnheim, Mr. S. I. Benn, Prof. R. L. Franklin and Mr. G. Molnar for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.

By Beran Harry  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, Iss. 3, 1972-12 ,pp. : 207-221

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On justifying a metaethical theory 1 I am indebted to Mr. Fred Berger of the University of California and Dr. Douglas McGee of Vassar College for their critical comments on an earlier draft of this paper

By Blackstone William  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 1963-01 ,pp. : 57-66

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“Ought” from “Is” 1 I am grateful for criticisms of an earlier version from Mr. R. M. Hare (who kindly showed me a paper of his own on the earlier part of Searle's specimen argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams.

By Montague Roger  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, 1965-01 ,pp. : 144-167

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The problem of counterfactuals*I am indebted to Professors J. L. Mackie and J. B. Thornton for criticisms of an earlier draft.

By Walters R.S.  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, 1961-05 ,pp. : 30-46

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sensations and sensible properties*I am grateful to members of the philosophy departments in Dundee, Glasgow and St. Andrews, and especially to Professor R. J. Hirst, for helpful criticism of an earlier draft of this paper.

By Holborow Les  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 48, Iss. 1, 1970-05 ,pp. : 17-30

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite