Universalisability and egoism * This paper constitutes a considerable reworking of part of my Ph.D. dissertation, presented to the Universfty of Chicago in 1966; consequently, it owes a great deal to my dissertation advisors, particularly Professors Alan Gewirth and Fred Siegler. I have also been helped considerably by the criticisms of several of my former colleagues at York University who were kind enough to read the first draft of this paper.

Author： Silverstein Harry  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 0004-8402

Source： Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.46, Iss.3, 1968-12, pp. : 242-264

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

In defence of a simple solution 1 This paper has been greatly improved as a result of criticisms of earlier versions: the philosophy faculty at Calgary where it was read in 1969, Professors H. P. Grice, George Myro, and especially Benson Mates at Berkeley, where it formed part of the author's Ph.D. dissertation in May 1970, critics at the Annual Conference of the New Zealand Branch of the Australasian Association of Philosophy in May 1971, and the referee for this Journal .

By Reeves Alan  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 51, Iss. 1, 1973-05 ,pp. : 17-38

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Knowledge, belief and perceptual experiences 1 Part of this article is a revized version of a paper read at the New Zealand Philosophy Conference, in Dunedin, May, 1964. I wish to express my gratitude to all those people whose comments have helped me to improve it.

By Ziedins R.  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 44, Iss. 1, 1966-05 ,pp. : 70-88

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Putting Pluralism in its PlaceThis paper was first presented at a session on pluralism at the 1st Veritas Philosophy Conference at Yonsei University in Seoul, June 2014. My thanks go to Tim Fuller and Nikolaj Pedersen for the invitation to and organization of the conference, and to all those who attended and offered their feedback. Thanks go also to Derek Baker, Sam Baron, Jeremy Wyatt, and an anonymous referee for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Special thanks go to Dorit Bar‐On and Keith Simmons, and the members of their seminar on truth at the University of Connecticut in the spring of 2015. The work described in this paper was substantially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (HKU 23400014).

By  

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, Vol. 96, Iss. 1, 2018-01 ,pp. : 175-191

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

An analysis of Hare's application of the thesis of universalizability in his moral arguments*I am indebted to Professors D. Gauthier and L. W. Sumner for their helpful criticisms of this paper. The latter especially is to be thanked for his copious comments on several early drafts. His suggestions regarding the presentation of the material are in large part responsible for the present form of this paper.

By White Harold  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 47, Iss. 2, 1969-08 ,pp. : 174-183

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Queer arithmetics 1 For helpful criticisms of earlier drafts of this paper I am indebted to Mr. Eugene Steiner, Mr. Tom Sizemore and my wife.

By Lehman Hugh  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 48, Iss. 1, 1970-05 ,pp. : 31-43

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite