Related content

Ought, obligation and duty 1 I am indebted to Prof. P. Herbst for helpful discussions on this subject, and to Dr. J. Burnheim, Mr. S. I. Benn, Prof. R. L. Franklin and Mr. G. Molnar for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.

By Beran Harry  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, Iss. 3, 1972-12 ,pp. : 207-221

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Hart on rules of obligation1I wish to express my gratitude to Mr. David Schwartz and Professor Robert Summers for many helful suggestions and comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

By Siegler Frederick  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 45, Iss. 3, 1967-01 ,pp. : 341-355

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Epistemic closure under deductive inference: what is it and can we afford it?

By Sharon Assaf   Spectre Levi  

Synthese, Vol. 190, Iss. 14, 2013-09 ,pp. : 2731-2748

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

ROBERT LESLIE ELLIS AND JOHN STUART MILL ON THE ONE AND THE MANY OF FREQUENTISM

By Kilinç Berna  

British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 2000-06 ,pp. : 251-274

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

POST-AVICENNAN LOGICIANS ON THE SUBJECT MATTER OF LOGIC: SOME THIRTEENTH- AND FOURTEENTH-CENTURY DISCUSSIONS

By  

Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, 2012-02 ,pp. : 69-90

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite