![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Author: Burgess J.
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 0004-8402
Source: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.79, Iss.4, 2001-12, pp. : 507-524
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Related content
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Epistemicism, Distribution, and the Argument from Vagueness
NOUS, Vol. 52, Iss. 1, 2018-03 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Response-dependence without reduction?
By McFarland Duncan Miller Alexander
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 76, Iss. 3, 1998-09 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Two Conceptions of Response-dependence
By de Clercq R.
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 107, Iss. 2, 2002-01 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Epistemicism and Nihilism about Vagueness: What’s the Difference?
By Enoch David
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 133, Iss. 2, 2007-03 ,pp. :
![](/images/ico/ico_close.png)
![](/images/ico/ico5.png)
Shallow versus deep response-dependence
By Howat Andrew
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 156, Iss. 2, 2011-11 ,pp. :