Related content

Comparison of clinical outcome and urodynamic findings using “Perigee and/or Apogee” versus “Prolift anterior and/or posterior” system devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

By Long Cheng-Yu   Hsu Chun-Shuo   Jang Mei-Yu   Liu Cheng-Min   Chiang Po-Hui   Tsai Eing-Mei  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 2, 2011-02 ,pp. : 233-239

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Which factors determine subjective improvement following pelvic organ prolapse 1 year after surgery?

By Lawndy Sameh   Kluivers Kirsten   Milani Alfredo   Withagen Mariella   Hendriks Jan   Vierhout Mark  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 5, 2011-05 ,pp. : 543-549

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Impact of Prolift procedure on bladder function and symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse

By Su Tsung-Hsien   Liu Po-En   Lau Hui-Hsuan   Huang Wen-Chu   Lin Tzu-Yin   Hsieh Ching-Hung  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 5, 2011-05 ,pp. : 585-590

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Trocarless system for mesh attachment in pelvic organ prolapse repair—1-year evaluation

By Alcalay Menachem   Cosson Michel   Livneh Miron   Lucot Jean-Philippe   Theobald Peter  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 22, Iss. 5, 2011-05 ,pp. : 551-556

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery

By Cheon Cecilia   Maher Christopher  

International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 24, Iss. 11, 2013-11 ,pp. : 1873-1876

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite