Related content

Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey

By Cunillera Oriol   Tresserras Ricard   Rajmil Luis   Vilagut Gemma   Brugulat Pilar   Herdman Mike   Mompart Anna   Medina Antonia   Pardo Yolanda   Alonso Jordi   Brazier John   Ferrer Montse  

Quality of Life Research, Vol. 19, Iss. 6, 2010-08 ,pp. : 853-864

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

EQ-5D in a general population survey – A description of the most commonly reported EQ-5D health states using the SF-36

By Nordlund A.   Ekberg K.   Kristenson M.   Group Linquest  

Quality of Life Research, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, 2005-05 ,pp. : 1099-1109

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D

By Walters Stephen   Brazier John  

Quality of Life Research, Vol. 14, Iss. 6, 2005-08 ,pp. : 1523-1532

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Erratum to: New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 health status questionnaires

By Tucker Graeme   Adams Robert   Wilson David  

Quality of Life Research, Vol. 19, Iss. 7, 2010-09 ,pp. : 1077-1077

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 health status questionnaires

By Tucker Graeme   Adams Robert   Wilson David  

Quality of Life Research, Vol. 19, Iss. 7, 2010-09 ,pp. : 1069-1076

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite