Should Independent Directors Have Term Limits? The Role of Experience in Corporate Governance

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN: 1755-053x|44|3|583-621

ISSN: 0046-3892

Source: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, Vol.44, Iss.3, 2015-09, pp. : 583-621

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

We examine the role of independent directors with extended tenure in board‐level governance, monitoring decisions, and advising outcomes. These directors exhibit a higher level of commitment as they attend more board meetings and take more committee memberships. Firms with a higher proportion of these directors have lower chief executive officer (CEO) pay, higher CEO turnover‐performance sensitivity, and a smaller likelihood of intentionally misreporting earnings. These firms also restrict the expansion of resources under the CEO's control as they are less likely to make acquisitions, while the acquisitions they do make are of higher quality. Efforts to impose term limits on directors may, therefore, be misguided.