Chapter
The Fourth Amendment and Technology
GPS MONITORING: STATES’ RESPONSES
GPS MONITORING: FEDERAL COURTS
Chapter 2:
GOVERNMENTAL TRACKING OF CELL
PHONES AND VEHICLES: THE CONFLUENCE
OF PRIVACY, TECHNOLOGY, AND LAW
FOURTH AMENDMENT AND PRIVACY
FEDERAL SURVEILLANCE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)
Evidentiary Standards of Proof under ECPA
CELL PHONE SURVEILLANCE IN THE COURTS
Conflict in the Lower Courts
GOVERNMENTAL SURVEILLANCE OF VEHICLES
United States v. Knotts: Surveillance on Public Roadways
United States v. Karo: Surveillance on Private Property
GPS Tracking in the Seventh and Ninth Circuits
United States v. Jones: Supreme Court Review
PENDING LEGISLATION BEFORE THE 112TH
CONGRESS
Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments
Act of 2011 (S. 1011)
Geolocational Privacy and Surveillance Act (GPS Bill;
S. 1212 and H.R. 2168)
Chapter 3:
UNITED STATES V. JONES:
GPS MONITORING, PROPERTY,
AND PRIVACY
UNITED STATES V. JONES: A PROPERTY-BASED
APPROACH TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
THE IMPLICATIONS OF JONES AND TECHNOLOGY
Justice Alito’s Concurrence: A Katz-Based Approach
Justice Sotomayor’s Concurrence: The Broadest Reading
of the Fourth Amendment
WARRANT REQUIREMENT AFTER JONES
Chapter 4:
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE CASE
OF UNITED STATES V. JONES
Alito, J., Concurring in Judgment
Legalities of GPS and Cell Phone Surveillance
( Law, Crime and Law Enforcement )
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.