Highways: Federal-State Partnerships and Practices ( Transportation Infrastructure - Roads, Highways, Bridges, Airports and Mass Transit )

Publication series :Transportation Infrastructure - Roads, Highways, Bridges, Airports and Mass Transit

Author: Barbara E. Allen;Jason G. Gray  

Publisher: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.‎

Publication year: 2016

E-ISBN: 9781622577347

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9781622577330

Subject: U Transportation

Keyword: 交通运输

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Highways: Federal-State Partnerships and Practices

Chapter

FHWA BENEFITS FROM USING RECOGNIZED PARTNERSHIP PRACTICES

Partnering Activities and Practices

Partnership Benefits in Advancing the Federal-Aid Highway Program

Partnership Benefits in Oversight and Effects on Corrective Action Decisions

Navigating the “Gray Areas”

States’ Perspectives on Partnering and Oversight

FHWA’S PARTNERSHIP WITH STATES POSES RISKS IN FHWA’S OVERSIGHT

Partnership Created Challenges for FHWA in the Past

FHWA Sometimes Was Lax in Its Oversight or Reluctant to Take Corrective Action

FHWA Sometimes Showed a Lack of Independence in Decisions

Despite Partnership Risks, FHWA Has Good Oversight Practices in Several Areas

PARTNERING COULD HELP FHWA IMPLEMENT A PERFORMANCE-BASED SYSTEM, BUT LONG-STANDING CHALLENGES WOULD REMAIN

Legislation Approved by the Senate for a Performance-Based Highway Program

FHWA’s Partnership Approach Could Facilitate a Transition to a Performance-Based Program

FHWA Would Need to Mitigate Risks of Partnership

FHWA Would Need to Address Existing Oversight Weaknesses in Planning and Data Collection

Long-standing Challenges and the Need to Reexamine and Reform the Federal-Aid Highway Program Remain

CONCLUSIONS

MATTER FOR CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION

AGENCY COMMENTS

APPENDIX I. FHWA ORGANIZATION

APPENDIX II. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

End Notes

Chapter 2 HIGHWAY PROJECTS: SOME FEDERAL AND STATE PRACTICES TO EXPEDITE COMPLETION SHOW PROMISE

WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY

WHAT GAO FOUND

ABBREVIATIONS

BACKGROUND

THE PROCESS TO COMPLETE HIGHWAY PROJECTS IS COMPLEX AND LENGTHY DUE TO MULTIPLE FACTORS

Wide Range of Stakeholders

Large Number of Steps in the Process

Planning Phase

Preliminary Design and Environmental Review Phase

Final Design and Right-of-Way Acquisition Phase

Construction Phase

Additional Factors That Can Affect Time Frames

Funding Availability

Changing Transportation Priorities

Project Opposition

STATE DOTS GENERALLY AGREE THAT SAFETEA-LU PROVISIONS COULD DECREASE PROJECT TIME FRAMES BUT FIND SOME PROVISIONS MORE USEFUL THAN OTHERS

Minor Impacts to Protected Public Land

Design-Build Contracting

180-Day Statute of Limitations

Offering Financial Assistance to Stakeholder Agencies

Categorical Exclusion Approval Authority

Issue Resolution Process

NEPA Approval Authority

STATES AND FHWA HAVE INITIATED EFFORTS TO DEVELOP AND SHARE INNOVATIVE PRACTICES FOR EXPEDITING HIGHWAY PROJECTS

States Have Implemented Streamlining Practices Spanning All Project Phases

FHWA Is Sharing Practices among States Though It Is Too Soon to Know the Outcome

CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS

AGENCY COMMENTS

APPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

APPENDIX II. INITIATIVES IN THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION’S EVERY DAY COUNTS EFFORT

End Notes

INDEX

The users who browse this book also browse


No browse record.