FDA Review of Drug Applications ( Government Procedures and Operations )

Publication series :Government Procedures and Operations

Author: Morris Cooperman;Richard J. Porter  

Publisher: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.‎

Publication year: 2016

E-ISBN: 9781622577729

Subject: D034 State institutions;D52 世界政治制度与国家机构

Keyword: 世界政治制度与国家机构,国家体制,政治、法律

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

FDA Review of Drug Applications

Chapter

ORIGIN OF PRESCRIPTION DRUG USER FEES

CURRENT LAW

PDUFA IMPACT ON FDA REVIEW TIME AND BUDGET

Review Time

Budget

PDUFA V PROPOSAL

Proposed Legislative Language

Industry-FDA Performance Goals and Procedures for PDUFA V: The Agreement

Other Potential Issues

APPENDIX A. PROVISIONS IN FFDCA §736 AND §736B

APPENDIX B. PDUFA V AGREEMENT: PERFORMANCE GOALS AND PROCEDURES

End Notes

Chapter 2: PRESCRIPTION DRUGS: FDA HAS MET MOST PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR REVIEWING APPLICATIONS

WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY

WHAT GAO FOUND

ABBREVIATIONS

BACKGROUND

FDA MET MOST PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR ORIGINAL NDAS AND BLAS WHILE FDA REVIEW TIME INCREASED SLIGHTLY

FDA Met Most Performance Goals for Original NDAs and BLAs for FYs 2000 through 2010

Average FDA Review Time Increased Slightly for Original NDAs and BLAs from FY 2000 through FY 2010

Percentage of FDA First-Cycle Approvals Generally Increased from FY 2000 through FY 2010 but Decreased for Priority NDAs and BLAs since FY 2007

FDA MET MOST PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR ORIGINAL EFFICACY SUPPLEMENTS WHILE FDA REVIEW TIME INCREASED SLIGHTLY

FDA Met Most Performance Goals for Original Efficacy Supplements in FYs 2000 through 2010

Average FDA Review Time Generally Increased for Original Efficacy Supplements from FYs 2000 through 2010

Percentage of FDA First-Cycle Approvals Fluctuated for Priority Efficacy Supplements but Generally Increased for Standard Efficacy Supplements from FYs 2000 through 2010

STAKEHOLDERS NOTED ISSUES WITH THE PRESCRIPTION DRUG REVIEW PROCESS AND FDA IS TAKING STEPS THAT MAY ADDRESS MANY OF THOSE ISSUES

Stakeholders Noted Actions or Requirements That They Believe Can Increase Review Times

Stakeholders Cite Insufficient Communication between FDA and Stakeholders throughout the Review Process

Industry Stakeholders Report a Lack of Predictability and Consistency in Reviews

Consumer Advocacy Group Stakeholders Suggest That FDA May Provide Inadequate Assurance of the Safety and Efficacy of Approved Drugs

CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS

AGENCY COMMENTS

APPENDIX I. FDA NDA AND BLA REVIEW PERFORMANCE FOR FISCAL YEARS (FYS) 2000 THROUGH 2011

APPENDIX II: FDA EFFICACY SUPPLEMENT REVIEW PERFORMANCE FOR FISCAL YEARS (FYS) 2000 THROUGH 2011

APPENDIX III. FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) FDA STAFF SUPPORTING PRESCRIPTION DRUG USER FEE ACTIVITIES, FYS 2000 THROUGH 2010

End Notes

INDEX

The users who browse this book also browse


No browse record.