Keep the Damned Women Out :The Struggle for Coeducation ( The William G. Bowen Memorial Series in Higher Education )

Publication subTitle :The Struggle for Coeducation

Publication series :The William G. Bowen Memorial Series in Higher Education

Author: Malkiel Nancy Weiss  

Publisher: Princeton University Press‎

Publication year: 2016

E-ISBN: 9781400882885

P-ISBN(Paperback): 9780691172996

Subject: C91 Sociology;G64 Higher Education

Keyword: 社会学,教育立法与教育政策,教育,教育学史、教育思想史,高等教育,文化、科学、教育、体育

Language: ENG

Access to resources Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Description

As the tumultuous decade of the 1960s ended, a number of very traditional, very conservative, highly prestigious colleges and universities in the United States and the United Kingdom decided to go coed, seemingly all at once, in a remarkably brief span of time. Coeducation met with fierce resistance. As one alumnus put it in a letter to his alma mater, “Keep the damned women out.” Focusing on the complexities of institutional decision making, this book tells the story of this momentous era in higher education—revealing how coeducation was achieved not by organized efforts of women activists, but through strategic decisions made by powerful men.

In America, Ivy League schools like Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Dartmouth began to admit women; in Britain, several of the men’s colleges at Cambridge and Oxford did the same. What prompted such fundamental change? How was coeducation accomplished in the face of such strong opposition? How well was it implemented? Nancy Weiss Malkiel explains that elite institutions embarked on coeducation not as a moral imperative but as a self-interested means of maintaining a first-rate applicant pool. She explores the challenges of planning for the academic and non-academic lives of newly admitted women, and shows how, with the exception of Mary Ingraham Bunting at Radcliffe, every decision maker leading the charge for coeducation was male.

Drawing on unprecedented archival research, “Keep the Damn

Chapter

4 Princeton: “Coeducation Is Inevitable”

5 Princeton: “A Penetrating Analysis of Far-Reaching Significance”

6 Yale: “Treat Yale as You Would a Good Woman”

7 Princeton: “The Admission of Women Will Make Princeton a Better University”

8 Harvard-Radcliffe: Negotiating the “Non-Merger Merger”

9 Princeton: “I Felt I Was in a Foreign Country”

10 Harvard-Radcliffe: Playing in the “Big Yard” with the Boys

11 Yale: Yale Is “Not Yet Coeducational”

12 Princeton: “We’re All Coeds Now”

Part II THE SEVEN SISTERS: VASSAR, SMITH, AND WELLESLEY

13 Vassar: “Separate Education for Women Has No Future”

14 Vassar: “Vassar for Men?”

15 Smith: “A Looming Problem Which Is Going to Have to Be Faced”

16 Smith: “Recommitting to Its Original, Pioneering Purpose”

17 Wellesley: “Should Wellesley Jump on the Bandwagon?”

18 Wellesley: “Having the Courage to Remain a Women’s College”

Part III REVISITING THE IVIES: DARTMOUTH

19 Dartmouth: “For God’s Sake, for Everyone’s Sake, Keep the Damned Women Out”

20 Dartmouth: “Our Cohogs”

Part IV THE UNITED KINGDOM: CAMBRIDGE AND OXFORD

21 Cambridge: “Like Dropping a Hydrogen Bomb in the Middle of the University”

22 Cambridge: “A Tragic Break with Centuries of Tradition”

23 Oxford: “Our Crenellations Crumble, We Cannot Keep Them Out”

24 Oxford: As Revolutionary as “the Abolition of Celibacy among the Dons”

Part V TAKING STOCK

25 Epilogue

Manuscript Collections and Oral History Transcripts: Abbreviations

Interviews

Index

The users who browse this book also browse


No browse record.